2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1975 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1364 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1975 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | 616 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |
