2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | 616 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |
