2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | 616 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2480 mm |
