2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 527 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 164. (205 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Ram | 164 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3350 mm |
