2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 590 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ram | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2760 mm |
