2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 800 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 1981 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ram | Omega |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2670 mm |