2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Ram | M25 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
