2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1995 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 654 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 1995 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2880 mm |