2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (108 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 865 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1996 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Dodge | Rover |
| Model | Ram | 200 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2510 mm |
