2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Ram | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2380 mm |
