2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 564 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.

Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (305 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Dodge Ram 2004 Mazda Tribute
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Ram Tribute
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3906 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 173 HP 201 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 266 Nm
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2070 kg 1506 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 2030 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2630 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]