2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 265 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Ram | XK |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2590 mm |