2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.4 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100.6 mm | 76 mm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2970 mm |