2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | Matrix |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 173 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |