2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2012 Daewoo Kalos
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Kalos. (93 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1169 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (732 Nm) has 602 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Kalos. 2012 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 2012 Daewoo Kalos | |
Make | Dodge | Daewoo |
Model | Ram | Kalos |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 130 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2490 mm |