2003 Dodge Ram vs. 2012 Mitsubishi ASX
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi ASX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 555 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. (196 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Ram | 2012 Mitsubishi ASX | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | ASX |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 196 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4295 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 63 L |