2003 Dodge Viper vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2003 Dodge Viper is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Viper (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Viper weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Dodge Viper | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Viper | Elan |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |