2003 Donkervoort D8 vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500

To start off, 2003 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Donkervoort D8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Singer SM 1500 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Donkervoort D8.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Donkervoort D8 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Donkervoort D8 1951 Singer SM 1500
Make Donkervoort Singer
Model D8 SM 1500
Year Released 2003 1951
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1780 cc 1495 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 47 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 98 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 2200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 630 kg 840 kg
Vehicle Length 3420 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2310 mm 2320 mm