2003 Eagle Talon vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Eagle Talon would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Talon (208 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Eagle Talon. (290 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Eagle Talon. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2003 Eagle Talon has manual transmission. 2003 Eagle Talon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Eagle Talon | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Eagle | Honda |
Model | Talon | CR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2619 mm |