2003 Eagle Vision vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1955 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1955 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Eagle Vision | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Eagle | Ford |
| Model | Vision | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
