2003 Eagle Vision vs. 1959 Riley Two Point Six
To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Riley Two Point Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Riley Two Point Six would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1959 Riley Two Point Six. (97 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1959 Riley Two Point Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Riley Two Point Six weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Eagle Vision.
Because 1959 Riley Two Point Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Riley Two Point Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Eagle Vision | 1959 Riley Two Point Six | |
Make | Eagle | Riley |
Model | Vision | Two Point Six |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |