2003 Eagle Vision vs. 1971 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Eagle Vision weights approximately 610 kg more than 1971 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1971 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1971 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: