2003 Eagle Vision vs. 1972 Volvo 145
To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Eagle Vision weights approximately 280 kg more than 1972 Volvo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Eagle Vision | 1972 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Eagle | Volvo |
| Model | Vision | 145 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
