2003 Eagle Vision vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 266 kg more than 2003 Eagle Vision.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Eagle Vision | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Eagle | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Vision | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1836 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
