2003 Eagle Vision vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Eagle Vision weights approximately 385 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Eagle Vision | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Eagle | Mazda |
Model | Vision | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |