2003 Eagle Vision vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Eagle Vision weights approximately 90 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda DrifterX has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda DrifterX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Eagle Vision | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Eagle | Mazda |
Model | Vision | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |