2003 Eagle Vision vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E (402 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2003 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2003 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 141 kg more than 2003 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Eagle Vision 2012 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Eagle Mercedes-Benz
Model Vision E
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2700 cc 4663 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 402 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1711 kg