2003 Fiat Albea vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Fiat Albea is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 40 kg more than 2003 Fiat Albea.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Albea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Fiat Albea | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Albea | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2710 mm |
