2003 Fiat Palio vs. 1948 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2003 Fiat Palio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Fiat Palio (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Fiat Palio (196 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Fiat Palio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Palio | 1948 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Palio | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |