2003 Fiat Palio vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2003 Fiat Palio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Fiat Palio (70 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 205 kg more than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Palio. (95 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Palio | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Palio | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |