2003 Fiat Palio vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2003 Fiat Palio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Fiat Palio (62 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Palio. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Palio | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Palio | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1251 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |