2003 Fiat Palio vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Fiat Palio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Fiat Palio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Palio. (69 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Fiat Palio weights approximately 190 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Fiat Palio (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Fiat Palio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Palio | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Palio | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2390 mm |