2003 Fiat Palio vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Fiat Palio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (99 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Palio. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Fiat Palio (196 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2003 Fiat Palio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo has automatic transmission and 2003 Fiat Palio has manual transmission. 2003 Fiat Palio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Palio | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Palio | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2525 mm |