2003 Fiat Panda vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (51 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Panda | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Fiat | Volkswagen |
Model | Panda | 1500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2430 mm |