2003 Fiat Panda vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,251 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Fiat Panda (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Fiat Panda weights approximately 256 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Fiat Panda (144 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: