2003 Fiat Panda vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 589 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Panda. (144 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Panda | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | Panda | MK II |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1251 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 861 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 90 L |