2003 Fiat Panda vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Panda. (81 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Panda | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Panda | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 715 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2210 mm |