2003 Fiat Panda vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (51 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Fiat Panda weights approximately 2 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 88 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Fiat Panda 1996 Renault Clio
Make Fiat Renault
Model Panda Clio
Year Released 2003 1996
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1108 cc 1171 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 88 Nm 88 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 75.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 64.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 860 kg 858 kg
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 L 66 L