2003 Fiat Panda vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Fiat Panda would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 525 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Panda. (88 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Panda | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Fiat | Mini |
Model | Panda | Countryman |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.8 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 47 L |