2003 Fiat Punto vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2003 Fiat Punto is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Fiat Punto (93 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Punto should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 Fiat Punto.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Fiat Punto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Punto. (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Punto.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Punto | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Fiat | Jeep |
Model | Punto | CJ |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |