2003 Fiat Punto vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2003 Fiat Punto is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Punto. (71 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Punto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 305 kg more than 2003 Fiat Punto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Punto. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Punto. 1964 Ford Zodiac has automatic transmission and 2003 Fiat Punto has manual transmission. 2003 Fiat Punto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Ford Zodiac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Fiat Punto | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Punto | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1251 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 45 L |
