2003 Fiat Punto vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2003 Fiat Punto is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Punto. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Punto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Fiat Punto weights approximately 210 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Fiat Punto | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Fiat | Lotus |
| Model | Punto | Elan |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
