2003 Fiat Punto vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Fiat Punto is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Punto. (93 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Punto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 767 kg more than 2003 Fiat Punto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Punto. (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Punto. 2002 Opel Omega has automatic transmission and 2003 Fiat Punto has manual transmission. 2003 Fiat Punto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Opel Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Punto | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Fiat | Opel |
Model | Punto | Omega |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Top Speed | 178 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.8 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 75 L |