2003 Fiat Punto vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Fiat Punto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Fiat Punto would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Punto. (71 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Punto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Punto. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Punto.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Fiat Punto | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Punto | Rogue |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1251 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 3.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |