2003 Fiat Siena vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Fiat Siena is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Siena. (69 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Siena. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Fiat Siena | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Fiat | Triumph |
| Model | Siena | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 20.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |
