2003 Ford 427 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2003 Ford 427 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford 427 (582 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 516 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford 427 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford 427 (704 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 557 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford 427 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 427 | Renown |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 582 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 704 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |