2003 Ford 427 vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 2003 Ford 427 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford 427 (582 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 426 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 164. (156 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford 427 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford 427 (704 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 164. (241 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford 427 | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | 427 | 164 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 582 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 704 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |