2003 Ford 427 vs. 1982 Honda Accord
To start off, 2003 Ford 427 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Honda Accord would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford 427 (582 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 503 more horse power than 1982 Honda Accord. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford 427 should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Accord.
Because 2003 Ford 427 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford 427. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford 427 (704 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 578 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford 427 | 1982 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 427 | Accord |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 582 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 704 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |