2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1945 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 91 kg more than 1945 Riley RM A.
Because 1945 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1945 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | C-MAX | RM A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1945 |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2870 mm |