2003 Ford C-MAX vs. 1952 Renault Colorale
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 2,383 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Colorale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Colorale weights approximately 284 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1952 Renault Colorale is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Colorale. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford C-MAX | 1952 Renault Colorale | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | C-MAX | Colorale |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 45 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2670 mm |